Question.. Substantiate, with examples, the view that the Indian Constitution is a hallmark of rigid and flexible constitution. How has this rigidity and flexibility helped the Indian Constitution for more than seven decades, while many other decolonised countries have either replaced or subverted their respective constitutions? POINTS - I. Rigid & flexible feature of constitution II. Features & nature of amendments of constitution III. Features of Balance of change & continuity IV. Conclusion ANSWER - Based upon the provisions made for its amendment, a constitution can be flexible or rigid or a mixture of both. A flexible constitution can be amended by ordinary law-making exercise, while a rigid constitution can be amended by a very difficult and special procedure. As regards to Indian constitution, it strikes a balance between rigidi...
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
PSIR QUESTION 18.. .Why quit India movement known as most un-gandhian of all Gandhian movements? What are the distinct features of Gandhian mass movements
Get link
Facebook
X
Pinterest
Email
Other Apps
-
Today's question..18 Why quit India movement known as most un-gandhian of all Gandhian movements? What are the distinct features of Gandhian mass movements Points -
Start by briefly introducing Quit India Movement
Explain why it was the most Ungandhian movement
Tell about Gandhi and distinct features of mass movements
Conclusion
Answer -
●Start by briefly introducing Quit India Movement Following the adoption of 8 August 1942 resolution at Gowalia tank in Bombay, Indian masses undertook perhaps the most militant nationalist movement known as Quit India movement. It was a call for nothing less than freedom, as Gandhi announced while articulating his thought on this Anti-British counter-offensive.
●Explain why it was the most Ungandhian movement Unlike Non-Cooperation Movement and Civil Disobedience Movement which were basically non-violent campaigns against the British rule in India, Quit India movement was an ultimatum to British for final withdrawal.
Quit India Movement was a Gandhi-led Un-Gandhian campaign since he extorted to take up arms in self-defense and resorted to armed resistance against a stronger and well equipped aggressor.
He gave the call for “open rebellion” and gave the slogan “Do or die”, but don’t stay alive to see nation in bondage. Gandhi proudly said that nation will live when people are ready to die for it. Gandhi called it the last struggle of his life & assured the masses that movement won’t be called off. Unlike previous movements, he didn’t condemn violence of people against bigger violence of State to the extent he also permitted to take controlof police station if needed. Thus, it can be said with certainty that Quit India Movement was the most Un-Gandhian of all Gandhian movements.
●Tell about Gandhi and distinct features of mass movements Gandhi adopted the methodology of mass Satyagraha which insistent on truth, and his core concept was Ahimsa or non-violence. Some specific features of Gandhian mass movements were his ability to keep them controlled and not spontaneous or knee-jerk reaction to British order.
He himself talked about the journey as protracted struggle or long drawn in approach to keep the momentum going. Gandhi used to begin the mass movements by engaging critique of social order as precondition to waging of political struggle, thus making political movements social movements as well which gave him legitimacy and large scale support of masses.
He knew the limited capacity of the masses and used to call off the movements before weakness of movement could reach the surface. Gandhi was great strategist and he preplanned the events beforehand, his strategy allowed him to choose battlefield & time. Hence, Gandhi was pro-active & not reactive,
●Conclude on following lines Purpose of Gandhi to pursue non-violence was to bring masses to the field of national movement, which proved the strategical abilities in Gandhi where he could take administration by surprise and eventually won concessions from the authorities.
Q .4. ‘Aristotle is a status quoist’. In the light of this statement, examine Aristotle's view on revolution Answer: In the history of Western political tradition, both Plato and Aristotle enjoy a pre-eminent position as the great Masters. while Plato was an idealist and a radical, Aristotle is a realist and a moderate. Aristotle has been regarded as the father of Political Science as he was the first to analyse, critically and systematically, the subject matter of politics and identified its core elements such as Sovereignty of law, constitutionalism, faith in moderation, proportionate equality, and causes and remedies of revolution. As instability and transformation has been the most characteristic feature of Greek Political life, Aristotle has examined the cause for instability, change and revolution, and prescribed remedies against unnecessary and incessant change. For Aristotle, Revolution meant any change in the political system such as change from a moderate to an ext...
question 14..Compare Kautilya with Machiavelli. Should Kautilya be called as Indian Machiavelli? Points 1.Give a brief introduction of Kautilya & Machiavell 2.Give similarities between Kautilya and Machiavelli 3.Give differences between Kautilya and Machiavelli 4.Tell whether Kautilya should be called Indian Machiavelli & conclude Answer - Give a brief introduction of Kautilya & Machiavelli There are two names celebrated in history for an exposition of the theory of StatecraftKautilya and Machiavelli. Kautilya, a teacher of political morals is a contemporary and guide of Chandragupta Maurya and is the author of Arthashastra which deals with all the doctrines concerned with practical life, economics, administration and politics. Machiavelli who was the first to sense the upheaval of Renaissance is the author of “Prince” treats mainly of statecraft and lays down conditions that are necessary for the establishment and operation of machinery of a stron...
Question.. Substantiate, with examples, the view that the Indian Constitution is a hallmark of rigid and flexible constitution. How has this rigidity and flexibility helped the Indian Constitution for more than seven decades, while many other decolonised countries have either replaced or subverted their respective constitutions? POINTS - I. Rigid & flexible feature of constitution II. Features & nature of amendments of constitution III. Features of Balance of change & continuity IV. Conclusion ANSWER - Based upon the provisions made for its amendment, a constitution can be flexible or rigid or a mixture of both. A flexible constitution can be amended by ordinary law-making exercise, while a rigid constitution can be amended by a very difficult and special procedure. As regards to Indian constitution, it strikes a balance between rigidi...
Comments
Post a Comment